To the Editor:
Given China’s economic gains, the possibility rises that it may be following a business model superior to our current path. Unlike here, the Chinese government has a firm oversight of its growing economy. Compensation is regulated, profits benefit the entire nation, and corruption and mismanagement are severely punished, even to the point of death. Here, on the other hand, corporate campaign money controls the government, with lobbyists actually writing regulatory legislation. CEO’s are compensated royally, profits go mainly to a small, already wealthy, elite class, and mismanagement is often rewarded with a year-end bonus. Tax breaks were even given to companies for taking their jobs and technical expertise overseas.
Further, China has generally relied on a traditional capitalist approach to gaining prosperity. It is investing money (much of it American consumer dollars) in its manufacturing and transportation infrastructure, in education for its youth, and in peacefully securing resources for its industrial growth, while we in the West have gotten so bogged down in unending wars and occupation of oil-producing nations in the Middle East that our longstanding support for education, infrastructure, and social safety nets is now being termed, “no longer affordable”. This seems an odd tale of two nations heading in vastly divergent directions.
RP
In fairness China’s economy is no more utopian than the US economy. It may look perfect if viewed from the outside the picture on the inside is far less clear, with huge problems to overcome and weak centralisation it may not be as easy as the author here feels.
The contention is not that the Chinese economy is “utopian” but simply that it is outperforming our dysfuntional system. Am I anywhere wrong on my critique?